By the reviewing scientific material for compliance with formal requirements, the editors of the journal also check for the presence of borrowed text for using the plagiarism check system in the StrikePlagiarism.com system. Increasing the originality of the text using technical or other unfair methods will result in refusal of publication.
Only original materials in which, according to the results of the check using the anti-plagiarism system, the originality is 70% or more are sent for further review. If the scientific material does not meet the design requirements of the journal and is not an original work according to the results of the plagiarism check, then it is returned to the author for correspondence with the possibility of re-submitting it for review by the editorial board via the electronic platform of the journal.
If the authors used the works of other researchers when writing, then they must refer to the works of these scientists and correctly format the cited text.
If prior publication or plagiarism is detected, the manuscript will be rejected or retracted.
In case of detection of violations of principles, standards and norms of scientific ethics generally accepted by the international community, the editorial board of the journal undertakes to act in accordance with the standards of the COPE Publication Ethics Committee (https://publicationethics.org/).
The journal is guided in its work by the WAME recommendations (https://wame.org/page3.php?id=106) on chatbots and generative artificial intelligence in relation to scientific publications.
The author or authors are responsible for the accuracy of the information in the material.